Synclair v. County of Fresno
This text of Synclair v. County of Fresno (Synclair v. County of Fresno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LARRY SYNCLAIR, SR., individually and as a parent of Larry Synclair, Jr., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-16910 v. COUNTY OF FRESNO; DEPARTMENT OF D.C. No. CV-01-06546-AWI CHILD ABDUCTION UNIT; WILLIAM ORDER FRANK; RON HOPPER; DENNIS LEWIS; EDWARD HUNT; KATHY MACKIE, Defendants-Appellees. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed June 2, 2006
Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, J. Clifford Wallace, and Stephen S. Trott, Circuit Judges
ORDER
On petition for writ of certiorari, the United States Supreme Court vacated and remanded the memorandum disposition “for further consideration in light of Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. [280], 125 S.Ct. 1517, 161 L.Ed2d 454 (2005).” Synclair v. County of Fresno, 126 S.Ct. 731 (Nov. 28, 2005).
We remand to the district court for further proceedings con- sistent with the direction of the Supreme Court.
6013 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Synclair v. County of Fresno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/synclair-v-county-of-fresno-ca9-2006.