Sylvia Cox Shy v. Roosevelt Morris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Sylvia Cox Shy v. Roosevelt Morris

DecidedDecember 19, 2018

DocketA19A0564

StatusPublished

This text of Sylvia Cox Shy v. Roosevelt Morris (Sylvia Cox Shy v. Roosevelt Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sylvia Cox Shy v. Roosevelt Morris, (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 19, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0564. SYLVIA COX SHY et al. v. ROOSEVELT MORRIS et al.

Sylvia Cox Shy, Stanley E. Morris and Franklin B. Morris (“the plaintiffs”) petitioned to partition real property pursuant to OCGA § 44-6-180 et seq. The trial court dismissed the petition for failure to join an indispensable party. The trial court ruled that the order was final as to all issues except payment of the special master’s fees, which the trial court reserved for later resolution. The plaintiffs filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. “Generally, an order is final and appealable when it leaves no issues remaining to be resolved, constitutes the court’s final ruling on the merits of the action, and leaves the parties with no further recourse in the trial court.” Thomas v. Douglas County, 217 Ga. App. 520, 522 (1) (457 SE2d 835) (1995). Here, the trial court reserved ruling on the allocation and payment of special master fees. See Uniform Superior Court Rule 46 (H). The case thus remains pending below. In order to appeal, the plaintiffs were required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), including obtaining a certificate of immediate review within ten days of the order to be appealed and filing an application to appeal within ten days after the certificate was issued. The plaintiffs’ failure to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Mays v. Rancine-Kinchen, 291 Ga. 283, 283-284 (729 SE2d 321) (2012). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/19/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 19, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0564. SYLVIA COX SHY et al. v. ROOSEVELT MORRIS et al.

Sylvia Cox Shy, Stanley E. Morris and Franklin B. Morris (“the plaintiffs”) petitioned to partition real property pursuant to OCGA § 44-6-180 et seq. The trial court dismissed the petition for failure to join an indispensable party. The trial court ruled that the order was final as to all issues except payment of the special master’s fees, which the trial court reserved for later resolution. The plaintiffs filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. “Generally, an order is final and appealable when it leaves no issues remaining to be resolved, constitutes the court’s final ruling on the merits of the action, and leaves the parties with no further recourse in the trial court.” Thomas v. Douglas County, 217 Ga. App. 520, 522 (1) (457 SE2d 835) (1995). Here, the trial court reserved ruling on the allocation and payment of special master fees. See Uniform Superior Court Rule 46 (H). The case thus remains pending below. In order to appeal, the plaintiffs were required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), including obtaining a certificate of immediate review within ten days of the order to be appealed and filing an application to appeal within ten days after the certificate was issued. The plaintiffs’ failure to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Mays v. Rancine-Kinchen, 291 Ga. 283, 283-284 (729 SE2d 321) (2012). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/19/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Sylvia Cox Shy v. Roosevelt Morris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sylvia-cox-shy-v-roosevelt-morris-gactapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack