Sylvester v. Born
19 A. 337, 132 Pa. 467, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 840
Opinions
The undisputed facts of this case, clearly stated in the report [479]*479of tlie learned master, justly entitled the plaintiff below to the decree of specific performance from which this appeal was taken. Neither of the specifications of error is sustained.
Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed, at the costs of appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sylvester v. Born, 19 A. 337, 132 Pa. 467, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 840 (Pa. 1890).
19 A. 337 (Sylvester v. Born) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Finn v. Glick
127 A.2d 204 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
L. C. S. Colliery, Inc. v. Globe Coal Co.
84 A.2d 776 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Walsh v. Powell
76 Pa. D. & C. 108 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1951)
Martin's Petition
58 Pa. D. & C. 695 (Northumberland County Orphans' Court, 1947)
Appeal of Gentile
43 Pa. D. & C. 53 (Fayette County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1941)
McClenachan v. Malis
164 A. 780 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Morrell v. Broadbent
140 A. 500 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Bonner v. Randal
7 Pa. D. & C. 294 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Estate of Connor
85 Pa. Super. 19 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Schermer v. Wilmart
127 A. 315 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Loughney v. Quigley
124 A. 84 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Barnes v. Rea
68 A. 836 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Borie v. Satterthwaite
37 A. 102 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
Borel v. Mead
3 N.M. 84 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1884)