Sykes v. Horry County
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7763
OSCAR LEE SYKES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HORRY COUNTY; TOM FOX, Director; SUSAN SAFFORD, Captain; A. CUNNINGHAM, Lieutenant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:04-cv-02329-RBH)
Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 2, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oscar Lee Sykes, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Oscar Lee Sykes appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Sykes’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Sykes v. Horry County, No. 4:04-
cv-02329-RBH (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sykes v. Horry County (Sykes v. Horry County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.