Sykes v. Horry County

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 2, 2007·No. 06-7763·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7763

OSCAR LEE SYKES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HORRY COUNTY; TOM FOX, Director; SUSAN SAFFORD, Captain; A. CUNNINGHAM, Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:04-cv-02329-RBH)

Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 2, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oscar Lee Sykes, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Oscar Lee Sykes appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Sykes’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Sykes v. Horry County, No. 4:04-

cv-02329-RBH (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sykes v. Horry County, (4th Cir. 2007).

Sykes v. Horry County (Sykes v. Horry County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related