Sykes v. Horry County

220 F. App'x 208
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 2, 2007·No. No. 06-7763·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Oscar Lee Sykes appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sykes’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sykes v. Horry County, No. 4:04-cv-02329-RBH, 2006 WL 2827709 (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sykes v. Horry County, 220 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2007).

220 F. App'x 208 (Sykes v. Horry County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related