Syed v. Fedor

296 A.D.2d 399, 745 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7083
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 296 A.D.2d 399 (Syed v. Fedor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Syed v. Fedor, 296 A.D.2d 399, 745 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated August 27, 2001, and (2) an order of the same court, entered December 7, 2001, which upon, inter alia, the dismissal of the action upon the plaintiff’s failure to appear at a scheduled conference, denied his motion to restore the action and to place it on the trial calendar.

Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the action upon the plaintiff’s failure to appear at a scheduled conference (see 22 NYCRR 202.27 [b]). Moreover, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion to restore the action and to place it on the trial calendar. A case dismissed pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27 may be restored only if the plaintiff can demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default in failing to appear at the conference, and a meritorious cause of action (see Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190, 197). Since the plaintiff demonstrated neither, the motion was properly denied. Santucci, J.P., Smith, Krausman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wahid v. Pour
89 A.D.3d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Zeltser v. Sacerdote
24 A.D.3d 541 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Davis v. Maldonado
307 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Jeganathan v. O'Reilly
195 Misc. 2d 197 (White Plains City Court, 2003)
Fujah v. V-M Auto Refinishing Corp.
192 Misc. 2d 170 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 A.D.2d 399, 745 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/syed-v-fedor-nyappdiv-2002.