Davis v. Maldonado

307 A.D.2d 948, 763 N.Y.S.2d 469
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 11, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, the defendants Jose Maldonado and St. Vincent’s Medical Center of Richmond appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated May 24, 2002, which granted the plaintiffs motion to restore the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion to restore the action. A case dismissed pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27 may be restored only if the plaintiff demonstrates both a reasonable excuse for the default in failing to appear at the conference and a meritorious cause of action (see Syed v Fedor, 296 AD2d 399 [2002]). Since the plaintiff demonstrated both, the motion was properly granted. Ritter, J.P., Peuerstein, McGinity, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Maldonado, 307 A.D.2d 948, 763 N.Y.S.2d 469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

307 A.D.2d 948 (Davis v. Maldonado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kandel v. Hoffman
309 A.D.2d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)