Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co.
141 A.2d 541, 27 N.J. 91, 1958 N.J. LEXIS 187
Opinions
The opinion of the court was delivered
We see no difference between this case and Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co., 9 N. J. 134 (1952). The great weight of authority is in accord with that decision. Annotation, 62 A. L. R. 1205 (1929).
The question is a close one, but an existing rule of law should not be overturned unless its injustice is clear. We are not satisfied that Reimann is wrong in its overall application.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co., 141 A.2d 541, 27 N.J. 91, 1958 N.J. LEXIS 187 (N.J. 1958).
141 A.2d 541 (Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
E & M Liquors, Inc. v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.
909 A.2d 1141 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
Bongo v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.
595 A.2d 557 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)
Weinberg v. Dinger
524 A.2d 366 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1987)
Weinberg v. Penns Grove Water Co.
524 A.2d 403 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
Brooks v. City of Orange
297 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1972)
J. H. M. Realty Corp. v. Town of Belleville
297 A.2d 2 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1972)
Hut v. Antonio
229 A.2d 823 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Notare v. Notare
166 A.2d 816 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
HASTINGS BY HASTINGS v. Hastings
163 A.2d 147 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)
Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co.
141 A.2d 541 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1958)