Swope v. Leffingwell

105 U.S. 3, 26 L. Ed. 939, 1881 U.S. LEXIS 2081
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 23, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 105 U.S. 3 (Swope v. Leffingwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swope v. Leffingwell, 105 U.S. 3, 26 L. Ed. 939, 1881 U.S. LEXIS 2081 (1882).

Opinion

105 U.S. 3

26 L.Ed. 939

SWOPE
v.
LEFFINGWELL.

October Term, 1881

ERROR to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.

This was a suit brought in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, against Leffingwell and the other defendants, to restrain and enjoin the sale of certain real estate in the city of St. Louis, under a deed of trust executed to secure the payment of a promissory note whereof the Atlas National Bank of Boston became the purchaser. The case was ultimately determined by the Supreme Court of the State reversing the decrees of the subordinate courts, and directing that the bill be dismissed. Swope sued out this writ of error.

A motion was made to dismiss the writ for want of jurisdiction, upon the ground that there was no Federal question involved; to which was united a motion to affirm.

Mr. Philip Phillips in support of the motions.

Mr. E. B. Sherzer, contra.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

We have jurisdiction of this case. The motion to dismiss is, therefore, denied; but as the only Federal question presented on the merits was decided by the court below in accordance with our rulings in National Bank v. Matthews (98 U. S. 621) and National Bank v. Whitney (103 id. 99), the motion to affirm is

Granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowles v. Inland Empire Dairy Ass'n
53 F. Supp. 210 (E.D. Washington, 1943)
Hill County v. Bryant & Huffman
16 S.W.2d 513 (Texas Supreme Court, 1929)
Anderson v. Reed
1928 OK 268 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Baker v. Farmers' Welfare Union
3 S.W.2d 155 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Christilaw v. First National Bank
215 N.W. 470 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1927)
Ganado Land Co. v. Smith
290 S.W. 920 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Baker v. Schofield
221 F. 322 (Ninth Circuit, 1915)
Barron v. McKinnon
196 F. 933 (First Circuit, 1912)
Kerfoot v. Farmers' and Merchants' Bank
218 U.S. 281 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Nutt v. Knut
200 U.S. 12 (Supreme Court, 1906)
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. McKENDREE
203 U.S. 514 (Supreme Court, 1905)
People ex rel. Commissioners of Highways v. Board of Supervisors
122 Ill. App. 40 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1905)
State v. American Book Co.
76 P. 411 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1904)
Savings & Trust Co. of Cleveland v. Bear Valley Irr. Co.
112 F. 693 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California, 1902)
First National Bank v. Grosshans
85 N.W. 542 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1901)
Baldwin v. Maryland
179 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 1900)
McCormick v. Market Bank
165 U.S. 538 (Supreme Court, 1897)
Chattanooga, R. & C. R. v. Evans
66 F. 809 (Sixth Circuit, 1895)
First National Bank v. Andrews
34 P. 913 (Washington Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 U.S. 3, 26 L. Ed. 939, 1881 U.S. LEXIS 2081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swope-v-leffingwell-scotus-1882.