Swope v. Leffingwell
105 U.S. 3
Opinion
delivered the, opinion of the court.
We have jurisdiction of this case. The motion to dismiss , is, therefore, denied; but as the only Federal question presented on the merits was decided by the court below in accordance with our rulings in National Bank v. Matthews (98 U. S. 621) and National Bank v. Whitney (108 id. 99), the motion to affirm is
Granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swope v. Leffingwell, 105 U.S. 3 (1881).
105 U.S. 3 (Swope v. Leffingwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Swope v. Leffingwell
105 U.S. 3 (Supreme Court, 1882)