Swinks v. Commissioner

51 T.C. 13, 1968 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 50
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedOctober 7, 1968
DocketDocket No. 6562-66
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 51 T.C. 13 (Swinks v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swinks v. Commissioner, 51 T.C. 13, 1968 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 50 (tax 1968).

Opinion

Dawson, Judge:

Respondent has asserted against petitioner limited transferee liability of $12,000, plus interest thereon as provided by law, for an income tax deficiency due from Swinks Construction Co., transferor, for the taxable year ended June 30,1959, in the amount of $105,736.60 and additions to tax under sections 6651(a) and 6653(a), I.R.C. 1954, in the amounts of $26,434.15 and $5,286.83, respectively.

Since the deficiency and additions to tax due from Swinks Construction Co. for the taxable year ended June 30, 1959, have been established by a prior order of this Court, the only two issues remaining for decision are (1) whether petitioner is liable as a transferee to the extent of $12,000, plus interest thereon as provided by law, for the unpaid income tax deficiency and additions to tax due from Swinks Construction Co. and (2) whether the assessment and collection of the deficiency from petitioner as transferee are barred by the statute of limitations.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.

Archie A. Swinks (herein referred to as petitioner) was a resident of Decatur, Ga., at the time he filed his petition in this proceeding.

Swinks Construction Co. (sometimes herein referred to as the trans-feror) was incorporated under laws of the State of Georgia on March 2, 1954, and filed its Federal corporate income tax return for each of its taxable years ended June 30, 1955, June 30, 1956, and June 30, 1958, with the district director of internal revenue at Atlanta, Ga. Swinks Construction Co. did not file a Federal corporate income tax return for its taxable year ended June 30,1959.

W. T. Swinks, Jr., who died on May 19,1962, was the president and sole stockholder of Swinks Construction Co., transferor, which was engaged in the business of residential construction.

During the same years that the transferor was engaged in residential construction, W. T. Swinks, Jr., was also engaged in residential construction as an individual separate and apart from Swinks Construction Co.

Petitioner, the brother of W. T. Swinks, Jr., and a vice president of Swinks Construction Co., was engaged during 1959 and a number of years prior thereto in the business of residential construction as an individual separate and apart from Swinks Construction Co. Petitioner owned no stock in the transferor corporation.

In January 1959, Swinks Construction Co. maintained two bank accounts with the Trust Co. of Georgia. These accounts were designated as account No. 1 and account No. 2. Account No. 1 had' a balance of $8.99 as of January 19,1959, and was inactive until it was closed in April 1959. Only petitioner was authorized to draw checks on account No. 2. A summary of the deposits and withdrawals to account No. 2 from January 1,1959, to May 15,1959, is as follows:

Particulars Amount
Balance Jan. 1, 1959_ $3,930.38
Add deposits Jan. 1 to May 15,1959_ 12,470.26
Deduct withdrawals Jan. 1 to May 15, 1959- (14,138.17)
Balance May 15, 1959_ 2,262.47

Account No. 2 was closed on July 11,1961.

Although Swinks Construction Co. has not been formally dissolved, it has been dormant, has not carried on any business, and has had no assets since June 1959.

After the sale of its last house on March 19,1959, the only assets of the transferor consisted of cash and a 1957 automobile, which at that time had a net book value of less than $1,875.

Except for the disposition of the automobile owned by the trans-feror which is not known, all of the remaining assets of the corporation, which consisted solely of cash, were transferred to petitioner. From January through May 1959, Swinks Construction Co. transferred $12,000 in cash to petitioner.

The dates and amounts of the checks comprising the $12,000 paid to petitioner are as follows:

Check No.— Amount of check Date of check im
1650 Jan. 2__.
1653 Feb. 5_
1658 Feb. 16-
1665 Apr. 7_
1668 May 6_
1669 May 14 _.
Total. 12, 000

The transfers of cash were made by the transferor to petitioner without petitioner’s paying or the transferor’s receiving any consideration in return therefor.

Petitioner did not report as income on his Federal income tax return any portion of this $12,000 he received from the transferor from January through May 1959.

On September 15, 1966, respondent sent to petitioner, by certified mail, a notice of transferee liability in which it was determined that for its taxable year ended June 30,1959, Swinks Construction Co. was liable for a deficiency in income tax in the amount of $105,736.60, and was also liable for additions to the tax under the provisions of sections 6651 (a) and 6653 (a), I.R.C. 1954, in the amounts of $26,434.15 and $5,286.83, respectively. In addition, the notice determined that, as a result of petitioner’s having received from the transferor in 1959 the $12,000 in cash, petitioner was liable as transferee of assets of Swinks Construction Co. for the deficiency in tax and additions to the tax due from the transferor for its taxable year ended June 30, 1959, to the extent of $12,000 plus interest as provided by law.

The petition filed with the Court on December 16,1966, by petitioner herein did not request a redetermination of the deficiency in tax or additions to the tax, and the Court by its order entered on May 17, 1967, held that future proceedings in this case would be limited to issues involving petitioner’s liability as a transferee of Swinks Construction Co. Thus, no petition was filed with this Court requesting a redetermination of the deficiency determined against the transferor in the notice mailed to petitioner on September 15,1966.

The deficiency in income tax and additions to the tax, as set forth in the notice herein, was properly determined against the transferor. No part of this deficiency or the statutory interest has been paid, and the entire amount is still outstanding.

By reason of the transfers, totaling $12,000 in cash, by the transferor to the petitioner, the transferor was rendered, and is, insolvent and without assets with which to pay the deficiency in income tax and additions to the tax due for its taxable year ended June 30, 1959, plus statutory interest thereon.

Because of the insolvency of the transferor from approximately June 1959 to the present, any further efforts by respondent to collect from the transferor the deficiency in income tax and additions to the tax due from the transferor would be a useless gesture.

During the years 1955 through 1959 Swinks Construction Co. maintained books and records which were used to prepare its Federal corporate income tax returns.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sandra K. Shockley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
872 F.3d 1235 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)
Shockley v. Comm'r
2015 T.C. Memo. 113 (U.S. Tax Court, 2015)
Espinosa v. Commissioner
2000 T.C. Memo. 66 (U.S. Tax Court, 2000)
Locke v. Commissioner
1996 T.C. Memo. 541 (U.S. Tax Court, 1996)
Stanko v. Commissioner
1993 T.C. Memo. 513 (U.S. Tax Court, 1993)
Mizrahi v. Commissioner
1992 T.C. Memo. 200 (U.S. Tax Court, 1992)
Cavanaugh v. Commissioner
1991 T.C. Memo. 407 (U.S. Tax Court, 1991)
Page Family Preservation Trust B v. Commissioner
1991 T.C. Memo. 223 (U.S. Tax Court, 1991)
Hamilton v. Commissioner
1991 T.C. Memo. 25 (U.S. Tax Court, 1991)
La Mothe v. Commissioner
1990 T.C. Memo. 63 (U.S. Tax Court, 1990)
Hunt v. Commissioner
1988 T.C. Memo. 360 (U.S. Tax Court, 1988)
Borg v. Commissioner
1987 T.C. Memo. 596 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Rauch v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 161 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Estate of Gryder v. Commissioner
1981 T.C. Memo. 466 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)
Scott v. Commissioner
70 T.C. 71 (U.S. Tax Court, 1978)
Workman v. Commissioner
1977 T.C. Memo. 378 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
Profit Mate, Inc. v. Commissioner
1977 T.C. Memo. 134 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
Don v. Commissioner
1971 T.C. Memo. 130 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
Weinberg Trust v. Comm'r
1970 T.C. Memo. 297 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)
Hicks v. Commissioner
1970 T.C. Memo. 267 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 T.C. 13, 1968 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swinks-v-commissioner-tax-1968.