Swett v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Swett v. State

829 So. 2d 901, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 850, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1963, 2002 WL 31259901

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 10, 2002·No. No. SC01-1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Swett, 772 So.2d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Frazier v. State, 766 So.2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this case.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., and HARDING, Senior Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Swett, 772 So.2d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Frazier v. State, 766 So.2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this case.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., and HARDING, Senior Justice, concur.

Swett v. State, 829 So. 2d 901, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 850, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1963, 2002 WL 31259901 (Fla. 2002).

Pincite

829 So. 2d 901 (Swett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related