Frazier v. State
This text of 748 So. 2d 1104 (Frazier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of armed robbery with a firearm. After supplemental briefing in this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we hold that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter a restitution order after Appellant filed a notice of appeal. See, e.g., Nguyen v. State, 655 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (citing Skaggs v. State, 620 So.2d 1304 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand to the trial court for a hearing and, if warranted, to again impose restitution.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
748 So. 2d 1104, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 690, 2000 WL 62971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.