Sweet v. Perkins

115 A.D. 920
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sweet v. Perkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 A.D. 784

Opinion

Order denying motion for new trial- on the ground of fraud and deceit- practiced by plaintiff at the trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., and Nash, J., who dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sweet v. Perkins, 115 A.D. 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

115 A.D. 920 (Sweet v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.