Sweet v. Perkins

101 N.Y.S. 1146

This text of 101 N.Y.S. 1146 (Sweet v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sweet v. Perkins, 101 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order denying motion for new trial on the ground of fraud and deceit practiced by plaintiff at the trial affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 101 N. Y. Supp. 163.

McLennan, P. j., and NASH, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sweet v. Perkins
115 A.D. 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweet-v-perkins-nyappdiv-1906.