Sweet v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

103 N.W.2d 544, 10 Wis. 2d 565, 1960 Wisc. LEXIS 413
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJune 7, 1960
StatusPublished

This text of 103 N.W.2d 544 (Sweet v. Farmers Insurance Exchange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sweet v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 103 N.W.2d 544, 10 Wis. 2d 565, 1960 Wisc. LEXIS 413 (Wis. 1960).

Opinion

Hallows, J.

The issues of negligence involved in this action are so intertwined with those in Giemza v. Allied American Mut. Fire Ins. Co., ante, p. 555, 103 N. W. (2d) 538, that a new trial is necessarily required for the reasons set forth therein. The damages may be in excess of the statutory amount. The record is not clear on this point. If they are, the trial court can reduce them and avoid the expense of relitigating the damages issue. Therefore, in the new trial the issues should be confined to the various questions of negligence involved.

By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and new trial granted on all issues except damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Giemza v. Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance
103 N.W.2d 538 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 N.W.2d 544, 10 Wis. 2d 565, 1960 Wisc. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweet-v-farmers-insurance-exchange-wis-1960.