Sweet v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Opinion
The issues of negligence involved in this action are so intertwined with those in Giemza v. Allied American Mut. Fire Ins. Co., ante, p. 555, 103 N. W. (2d) 538, that a new trial is necessarily required for the reasons set forth therein. The damages may be in excess of the statutory amount. The record is not clear on this point. If they are, the trial court can reduce them and avoid the expense of relitigating the damages issue. Therefore, in the new trial the issues should be confined to the various questions of negligence involved.
By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and new trial granted on all issues except damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
103 N.W.2d 544 (Sweet v. Farmers Insurance Exchange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.