Sweeny v. Wait
This text of 185 N.E. 794 (Sweeny v. Wait) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that, even assuming the existence of a policy covering the case, a question of fact was * involved as to whether notices thereof were properly posted. No opinion.
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Crouch, JJ. Not voting: Hubbs, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 N.E. 794, 261 N.Y. 690, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 1497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeny-v-wait-ny-1933.