Swartz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

714 So. 2d 508, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8844, 1998 WL 281355
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 3, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2433
StatusPublished

This text of 714 So. 2d 508 (Swartz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swartz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 714 So. 2d 508, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8844, 1998 WL 281355 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm an order of the commission denying Appellant unemployment compensation. The commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness and should not be reversed where it is supported by substantial, competent evidence. Jennings v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 689 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Here, substantial, [509]*509competent evidence supports the referee’s conclusion that Appellant voluntarily left his employment without good cause attributable to the employer. See Uniweld Prods., Inc. v. Industrial Relations Comm’n, 211 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

STONE, C.J., and FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jennings v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n
689 So. 2d 1193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
714 So. 2d 508, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8844, 1998 WL 281355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swartz-v-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-1998.