Swartz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
This text of 714 So. 2d 508 (Swartz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm an order of the commission denying Appellant unemployment compensation. The commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness and should not be reversed where it is supported by substantial, competent evidence. Jennings v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 689 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Here, substantial, [509]*509competent evidence supports the referee’s conclusion that Appellant voluntarily left his employment without good cause attributable to the employer. See Uniweld Prods., Inc. v. Industrial Relations Comm’n, 211 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
714 So. 2d 508, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8844, 1998 WL 281355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swartz-v-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-1998.