Swartz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

715 So. 2d 963, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8843, 1998 WL 281325
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 3, 1998·No. No. 97-1584·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm an order of the commission denying Appellant unemployment compensation. The commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness and should not be reversed where it is supported by substantial, competent evidence. Jennings v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 689 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The record here supports the referee’s conclusion that Appellant constituted an independent contractor. See Delco Inds., Inc. v. State, Dep’t. of Labor & Employment Sec., Div. of Unemployment Compensation, 519 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (stating that the principal consideration in determining employment status is the employer’s degree of control).

STONE, C.J., and GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swartz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 715 So. 2d 963, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8843, 1998 WL 281325 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

715 So. 2d 963 (Swartz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State, Dept. of Transp. v. Smithbilt
715 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)