Swartsell v. Swartsell

615 So. 2d 825, 1993 WL 74275
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 1993·No. 92-3136·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

615 So.2d 825 (1993)

Maria SWARTSELL, Appellant,
v.
Ralph SWARTSELL, Appellee.

No. 92-3136.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 17, 1993.

Harry D. Dennis, Jr., Pompano Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

*826 PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in resolving the issue of temporary custody of the parties' minor child without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Cf. Pearson v. Caudle, 593 So.2d 619 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.

STONE, J., concurs specially with opinion.

STONE, Judge, concurring specially.

I agree that the court's order went too far, given the limited nature of the emergency hearing. However, I would provide that the temporary custody aspect of the order remain in effect until a further temporary hearing is noticed and held.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swartsell v. Swartsell, 615 So. 2d 825, 1993 WL 74275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

615 So. 2d 825 (Swartsell v. Swartsell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matin v. Hill
801 So. 2d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Fee v. Usler
761 So. 2d 361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Crooks v. Crooks
657 So. 2d 918 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)