Pearson v. Caudle
This text of 593 So. 2d 619 (Pearson v. Caudle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ellen PEARSON, f/k/a Ellen Caudle, Appellant,
v.
Gary Jack CAUDLE, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Christopher J. Rush, Lantana, for appellant.
Elizabeth A. Wilkins, Boca Raton, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order which provided that temporary residential custody of the children be with the father in Florida pending the court's resolution of the wife's petition to permit her to move to North Carolina with the children. In affirming, we stress that the temporary decision should in no way affect the court's final resolution of the relocation and custody issues. We believe the trial court has considerable discretion to decide what temporary arrangements should prevail under these circumstances. We also note that the court agreed to decide the case on an expedited basis so that any disruption in the lives of the children would be minimized.
ANSTEAD, GUNTHER, and STONE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
593 So. 2d 619, 1992 WL 34686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-caudle-fladistctapp-1992.