Swann v. United States

785 A.2d 663, 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 245, 2001 WL 1511973
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 16, 2001
DocketNo. 98-CF-892
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 785 A.2d 663 (Swann v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swann v. United States, 785 A.2d 663, 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 245, 2001 WL 1511973 (D.C. 2001).

Opinions

AMENDED ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of this court’s October 3, 2001, order to show cause, appellant’s unopposed motion to extend time to file reply brief, the lodged reply brief, and appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw for business reasons, it is

ORDERED that appellant’s unopposed motion to extend time to file reply brief is granted and the Clerk shall file the lodged reply brief. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw for business reasons is granted. It is

[664]*664FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as being taken from a non-appealable order. See Smith v. United States, 686 A.2d 537 (D.C.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 839, 118 S.Ct. 115, 139 L.Ed.2d 67 (1997); Taylor v. United States, 603 A.2d 451 (D.C.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 852, 113 S.Ct. 155, 121 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blackson v. United States
897 A.2d 187 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
785 A.2d 663, 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 245, 2001 WL 1511973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swann-v-united-states-dc-2001.