Swann v. United States

785 A.2d 663, 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 245, 2001 WL 1511973
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided November 16, 2001·No. No. 98-CF-892·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

AMENDED ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of this court’s October 3, 2001, order to show cause, appellant’s unopposed motion to extend time to file reply brief, the lodged reply brief, and appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw for business reasons, it is

ORDERED that appellant’s unopposed motion to extend time to file reply brief is granted and the Clerk shall file the lodged reply brief. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw for business reasons is granted. It is

[664]*664FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as being taken from a non-appealable order. See Smith v. United States, 686 A.2d 537 (D.C.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 839, 118 S.Ct. 115, 139 L.Ed.2d 67 (1997); Taylor v. United States, 603 A.2d 451 (D.C.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 852, 113 S.Ct. 155, 121 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swann v. United States, 785 A.2d 663, 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 245, 2001 WL 1511973 (D.C. 2001).

785 A.2d 663 (Swann v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blackson v. United States
897 A.2d 187 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)