Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Swaisgood v. Puder

Swaisgood v. Puder

889 N.E.2d 1018, 118 Ohio St. 3d 445
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 2008·No. No. 2007-0442·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Turner v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co., 118 Ohio St.3d 215, 2008-Ohio-2010, 887 N.E.2d 1158.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Turner v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swaisgood v. Puder, 889 N.E.2d 1018, 118 Ohio St. 3d 445 (Ohio 2008).

889 N.E.2d 1018 (Swaisgood v. Puder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snay v. Burr
2020 Ohio 3828 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
Swaisgood v. Puder
893 N.E.2d 519 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)