Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Swaisgood v. Puder

Swaisgood v. Puder

867 N.E.2d 844, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1410
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 6, 2007
Docket2007-0442
StatusPublished

This text of 867 N.E.2d 844 (Swaisgood v. Puder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swaisgood v. Puder, 867 N.E.2d 844, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1410 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Erie App. No. E-06-033, 2007-Ohio-307. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2007-0035 and 2007-0112, Turner v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 87541, 2006-Ohio-6168; and briefing schedule stayed. Motion to consolidate denied.

Cupp, J., would accept the appeal and consolidate the cause with 2007-0035 and 2007-0112, Turner v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turner v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co., Unpublished Decision (11-22-2006)
2006 Ohio 6168 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Swaisgood v. Puder, Unpublished Decision (1-26-2007)
2007 Ohio 307 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 N.E.2d 844, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swaisgood-v-puder-ohio-2007.