Swaida v. IBM Retirement Plan

728 F.2d 159, 5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1121
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 22, 1984·No. No. 568, Docket 83-7792·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Weinfeld, J., Swaida v. IBM Retirement Plan, 570 F.Supp. 482 (S.D.N.Y.1983), granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The district court held that the elapsed time regulations promulgated by the Department of the Treasury were within its competence and in the exercise of delegated authority and that IBM, having structured its pension plan in conformity therewith, acted justifiably when it denied plaintiff’s claim to a vested pension.

We affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons spelled out by Judge Weinfeld in his opinion below, Swaida v. IBM Retirement Plan, 570 F.Supp. 482 (S.D.N.Y.1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swaida v. IBM Retirement Plan, 728 F.2d 159, 5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1121 (2d Cir. 1984).

728 F.2d 159 (Swaida v. IBM Retirement Plan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apitz v. Teledyne Monarch Rubber Hourly Pension Plan
800 F. Supp. 1526 (N.D. Ohio, 1992)
Swaida v. Ibm Retirement Plan
728 F.2d 159 (Second Circuit, 1984)