Swaby v. Home Box Office, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 21, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-07860·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ERROL JACOB JONES SWABY, Plaintiff, 24cv7860 (LTS) -against- ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE HOME BOX OFFICE, INC., Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. Plaintiff submitted the complaint without a signature. Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name – or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” See also Local Civil Rule 11.1(a). The Supreme Court has interpreted Rule 11(a) to require “as it did in John Hancock’s day, a name handwritten (or a mark handplaced).” Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 764 (2001). Plaintiff is directed to resubmit the signature page of the complaint with an original signature to the Court within thirty days of the date of this order. A copy of the signature page is attached to this order. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED. Dated: October 21, 2024 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge Dated Plaintiff’s Signature

First Name Middle Initial Last Name Errol J.J. Swaby

Street Address 435 highland Dr. Kern county,Bakersfield California. 93308

County, City State Zip Code

Telephone Number Email Address (if available) 6616129170 errol1swaby2@gmail.com I have read the Pro Se (Nonprisoner) Consent to Receive Documents Electronically: Yes If you do consent to receive documents electronically, submit the completed form with your complaint. If you do not consent, please do not attach the form.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swaby v. Home Box Office, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Swaby v. Home Box Office, Inc. (Swaby v. Home Box Office, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Becker v. Montgomery
532 U.S. 757 (Supreme Court, 2001)