SVP Med Supply, Inc. v. GEICO

76 Misc. 3d 127(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50777(U)
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJuly 22, 2022
Docket2020-476 K C
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 Misc. 3d 127(A) (SVP Med Supply, Inc. v. GEICO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SVP Med Supply, Inc. v. GEICO, 76 Misc. 3d 127(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50777(U) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

SVP Med Supply, Inc. v GEICO (2022 NY Slip Op 50777(U)) [*1]

SVP Med Supply, Inc. v GEICO
2022 NY Slip Op 50777(U) [76 Misc 3d 127(A)]
Decided on July 22, 2022
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on July 22, 2022
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, J.P., WAVNY TOUSSAINT, CHEREÉ A. BUGGS, JJ
2020-476 K C

SVP Med Supply, Inc., as Assignee of Brittany T. Bass, Appellant,

against

GEICO, Respondent.


The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell and Richard Rozhik of counsel), for appellant. Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff and Cheryl F. Korman of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Jill R. Epstein, J.), entered December 20, 2019. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath, and denying plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.

For the reasons stated in SVP Medsupply, Inc., as Assignee of Levin, Ludmila v GEICO Ins. Co. (— Misc 3d —, 2022 NY Slip Op — [appeal No. 2020-400 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.

GOLIA, J.P., TOUSSAINT and BUGGS, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: July 22, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SVP Med Supply, Inc. v. GEICO
76 Misc. 3d 127(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Misc. 3d 127(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50777(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/svp-med-supply-inc-v-geico-nyappterm-2022.