Svistunoff v. Svistunoff

239 P.2d 655, 108 Cal. App. 2d 646, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1721
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Svistunoff v. Svistunoff. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 Cal. App. 2d 638
California Court of Appeal·Decided January 15, 1952·No. Civ. No. 14830·Published

Opinion

BRAY, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order dated September 7, 1950, setting aside a default and judgment. As pointed out in our opinion this day filed in Svistunoff v. Svistunoff, No. 14831, ante, p. 638 [239 P.2d 650], this order is void on the face of the record and was properly vacated by the order of October 6th. Therefore, the appeal is moot, and is hereby dismissed.

Peters, P. J., and Wood (Fred B.), J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied February 14, 1952, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied March 13, 1952.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Svistunoff v. Svistunoff, 239 P.2d 655, 108 Cal. App. 2d 646, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1721 (Cal. Ct. App. 1952).

239 P.2d 655 (Svistunoff v. Svistunoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Svistunoff v. Svistunoff
239 P.2d 650 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)