Home/California Court of Appeal/Svistunoff v. Svistunoff

Svistunoff v. Svistunoff

239 P.2d 655, 108 Cal. App. 2d 646, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1721
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 15, 1952
DocketCiv. No. 14830
StatusPublished

This text of 239 P.2d 655 (Svistunoff v. Svistunoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Svistunoff v. Svistunoff, 239 P.2d 655, 108 Cal. App. 2d 646, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1721 (Cal. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

BRAY, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order dated September 7, 1950, setting aside a default and judgment. As pointed out in our opinion this day filed in Svistunoff v. Svistunoff, No. 14831, ante, p. 638 [239 P.2d 650], this order is void on the face of the record and was properly vacated by the order of October 6th. Therefore, the appeal is moot, and is hereby dismissed.

Peters, P. J., and Wood (Fred B.), J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied February 14, 1952, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied March 13, 1952.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Svistunoff v. Svistunoff
239 P.2d 650 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 P.2d 655, 108 Cal. App. 2d 646, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/svistunoff-v-svistunoff-calctapp-1952.