Suydam v. Pitcher

California Supreme Court

Suydam v. Pitcher

4 Cal. 280

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1854

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 4 Cal. 280 (Suydam v. Pitcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Suydam v. Pitcher, 4 Cal. 280 (Cal. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

Upon a re-argument, at this term, delivered the following opinion:

On the re-argnment of this cause, our attention has been particularly directed to the 68th section of the Practice Act, under which the authority of the Court below is said to be exercised.

After an examination of this section, we see no reason to change the opinion already given.

An appearance by attorney, at common law and by the express letter of our statute, amounts to an acknowledgment or waiver of service.

Such cases are not within the section referred to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

Upon a re-argument, at this term, delivered the following opinion:

On the re-argnment of this cause, our attention has been particularly directed to the 68th section of the Practice Act, under which the authority of the Court below is said to be exercised.

After an examination of this section, we see no reason to change the opinion already given.

An appearance by attorney, at common law and by the express letter of our statute, amounts to an acknowledgment or waiver of service.

Such cases are not within the section referred to.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cal. 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suydam-v-pitcher-cal-1854.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack