Sutton v. Wing

249 A.D.2d 945, 671 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5047
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Substantial evidence supports respondents’ determination that petitioner willfully and without good cause failed or refused to comply with the requirements of her Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training Program by failing to keep an Employment/Training appointment (see, Matter of Bishop v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 246 AD2d 391; Matter of Vicari v Wing, 244 AD2d 974; Matter of Blake v Wing, 244 AD2d 969; Matter of Allen v Dowling, 214 AD2d 446, 447; see generally, Social Services Law § 341 [1]; 18 NYCRR 385.0, 385.2, 385.18 [c] [4]; 385.19 [c] [2]; [d] [2]; [e]). Respondents thus properly suspended petitioner’s public assistance benefits pursuant to Social Services Law § 131 (5). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Green, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. Wing, 249 A.D.2d 945, 671 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

249 A.D.2d 945 (Sutton v. Wing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henopp v. Wing
283 A.D.2d 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)