Blake v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blake v. Wing

244 A.D.2d 969, 668 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12377

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 969 (Blake v. Wing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blake v. Wing, 244 A.D.2d 969, 668 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Substantial evidence supports respondents’ determination to discontinue petitioner’s home relief, food stamps and medical assistance benefits on the ground that petitioner willfully and without good cause failed or refused to comply with the requirements of the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training Program (see, Matter of Allen v Dowling, 214 AD2d 446, 447; see also, Social Services Law § 158-b; 18 NYCRR part 385). The medical reports received at the fair hearing indicate that there are limitations on the type of physical activities that petitioner is capable of performing, but that he is nevertheless employable (see, Matter of Van Leuvan v Blum, 73 AD2d 1003, 1004). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Substantial evidence supports respondents’ determination to discontinue petitioner’s home relief, food stamps and medical assistance benefits on the ground that petitioner willfully and without good cause failed or refused to comply with the requirements of the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training Program (see, Matter of Allen v Dowling, 214 AD2d 446, 447; see also, Social Services Law § 158-b; 18 NYCRR part 385). The medical reports received at the fair hearing indicate that there are limitations on the type of physical activities that petitioner is capable of performing, but that he is nevertheless employable (see, Matter of Van Leuvan v Blum, 73 AD2d 1003, 1004). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D.2d 969, 668 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-wing-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack