Sutton v. Township of Maurice River
108 A. 182, 93 N.J.L. 504, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 195
Opinion
The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Kalisch, White, Heppeni-ieimer; Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Black, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sutton v. Township of Maurice River, 108 A. 182, 93 N.J.L. 504, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 195 (N.J. 1919).
108 A. 182 (Sutton v. Township of Maurice River) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Rubenstein
151 F.2d 915 (Second Circuit, 1945)