Sutton v. Township of Maurice River

118 A. 627, 93 N.J. Eq. 484, 8 Stock. 484, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 319
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 9, 1922·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by AGce-Chancellor Learning

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Mintdrn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacit, AYjlltams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. Township of Maurice River, 118 A. 627, 93 N.J. Eq. 484, 8 Stock. 484, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 319 (N.J. 1922).

118 A. 627 (Sutton v. Township of Maurice River) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trenkamp v. Township of Burlington
406 A.2d 218 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Newark v. Cook
133 A. 875 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Williams v. Audubon
126 A. 664 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1924)