Sutton v. Township of Maurice River

118 A. 627, 93 N.J. Eq. 484, 8 Stock. 484, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 319
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 9, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 118 A. 627 (Sutton v. Township of Maurice River) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sutton v. Township of Maurice River, 118 A. 627, 93 N.J. Eq. 484, 8 Stock. 484, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 319 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by AGce-Chancellor Learning

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Mintdrn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacit, AYjlltams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trenkamp v. Township of Burlington
406 A.2d 218 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Newark v. Cook
133 A. 875 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Williams v. Audubon
126 A. 664 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 A. 627, 93 N.J. Eq. 484, 8 Stock. 484, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-township-of-maurice-river-nj-1922.