Sutton v. State

71 S.W.2d 1118, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 887
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 30, 1934·No. No. 16853·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for practicing barbering without having a certificate from the board of barber examiners, under the provisions of article 734a, Vernon’s Ann. P. C., Acts 41st Leg., 1st and 5th C. S. (chapters 65 and 62) as amended. Punishment assessed is a fine of $25.

The record is before this court without statement of facts. The only bills of exception relate to attacks upon the sufficiency of the complaint and information. We have not been favored with a brief from appellant’s attorneys. ' An examination of the law in ques[1119]*1119tion and the complaint and information does not lead us to believe the state’s pleading is defective.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. State, 71 S.W.2d 1118, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 887 (Tex. 1934).

71 S.W.2d 1118 (Sutton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.