Sutton v. State

72 S.W.2d 909, 126 Tex. Crim. 614, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 806
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 30, 1934·No. No. 16877.·Published

Opinions

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Under an indictment charging that ap-? pellant while intoxicated operated an automobile upon a public road in Comanche County, he was convicted and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. We notice, however, that in pronouncing sentence against appellant, as well as in the judgment, an error was committed by stating that his punishment would be assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years. The verdict of the jury assessed punishment at one year in the penitentiary and prohibited appellant from driving a motor vehicle on the highway for two years.

The judgment and sentence will be reformed to follow the verdict, and as thus reformed, will be affirmed.

Sentence reformed and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton v. State, 72 S.W.2d 909, 126 Tex. Crim. 614, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 806 (Tex. 1934).

72 S.W.2d 909 (Sutton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holden v. State
267 S.W. 275 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Smiddy v. State
274 S.W. 602 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Hart v. State
276 S.W. 233 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Thurman v. State
276 S.W. 1103 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Laudermilk v. State
47 Tex. Crim. 427 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1904)
Williams v. State
42 S.W.2d 1017 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)