Sutton v. Ford Motor Company

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: May 26, 2020
• Docket: 2:20-cv-00407
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

WQA0U 2.40 UV OVPAIVED WINE PYVUULTIOCIIL LO PUM □□□ raye it Via

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FILED on May 26, 2020 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: FORD MOTOR CO. DPS6 POWERSHIFT TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2814

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —48)

On February 2, 2018, the Panel transferred 75 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 289 F.Supp.3d 1350 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 447 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Central District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Andre Birotte, Jr. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Central District of California and assigned to Judge Birotte. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Central District of California for the reasons stated in the order of February 2, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Andre Birotte, Jr. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. aie fl po WCRI John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel

WwOAOD 2.6L VV Ot PAIVE NINES MVVULTICEI LO PUM □□ ovVrcy rPaywt evre

IN RE: FORD MOTOR CO. DPS6 POWERSHIFT TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2814

SCHEDULE CTO—48 — TAG—-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CACD No

CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2 20—-00407 Sutton v. Ford Motor Company □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 20—02123 Bogle v. Ford Motor Company et al 2:20-cv-04677-AB(P CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN 2:20-cv-04678-AB(PV CAS 3 20—00587 Bonner et al v. Ford Motor Company et al CAS 3 20-90609 HallyFerd-MeterCompanyetal Opposed 5/19/2020 CAS 3 20—00699 Mancilla v. Ford Motor Company et al 2:20-cv-04679-AB(PV'

I hereby attest and certify on 5/26/2020 that the foregoing document is full, true ARIES □□□□□□ and correct copy of the original on file in ho? S my office, and in my legal custody. = CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA a. \