Suttles v. Parrish
98 S.E. 93, 23 Ga. App. 309, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 100
Opinion
1. Under the facts of the ease, the excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, contain no error.
2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the- court did not err in overruling the motion for a new tidal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suttles v. Parrish, 98 S.E. 93, 23 Ga. App. 309, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 100 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
98 S.E. 93 (Suttles v. Parrish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chastain
103 S.E. 39 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)