Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chastain
This text of 103 S.E. 39 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chastain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was a verdict and judgment in the court below in favor of a shipper of live stock, for loss and damage alleged to have been occasioned by the negligent handling of the shipments by the defendant railroad company. Error is assigned upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based solely upon the general grounds'. While the plaintiff’s evidence is, to our minds, somewhat vague, the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and we would not feel justified in holding that it is without any evidence to support it. See Heath v. Sandersville R. Co., 23 Ga. App. 255 (98 S. E. 93).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 S.E. 39, 25 Ga. App. 275, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-railroad-v-chastain-gactapp-1920.