Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chastain

103 S.E. 39, 25 Ga. App. 275, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 737
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 5, 1920·No. 11134·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

There was a verdict and judgment in the court below in favor of a shipper of live stock, for loss and damage alleged to have been occasioned by the negligent handling of the shipments by the defendant railroad company. Error is assigned upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based solely upon the general grounds'. While the plaintiff’s evidence is, to our minds, somewhat vague, the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and we would not feel justified in holding that it is without any evidence to support it. See Heath v. Sandersville R. Co., 23 Ga. App. 255 (98 S. E. 93).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chastain, 103 S.E. 39, 25 Ga. App. 275, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 737 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

103 S.E. 39 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chastain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. State
235 S.E.2d 675 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Union Traction Co. v. City of Muncie
133 N.E. 160 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1921)