Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chastain

103 S.E. 39, 25 Ga. App. 275, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 737
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 5, 1920
Docket11134
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 39 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chastain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chastain, 103 S.E. 39, 25 Ga. App. 275, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 737 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

There was a verdict and judgment in the court below in favor of a shipper of live stock, for loss and damage alleged to have been occasioned by the negligent handling of the shipments by the defendant railroad company. Error is assigned upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based solely upon the general grounds'. While the plaintiff’s evidence is, to our minds, somewhat vague, the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and we would not feel justified in holding that it is without any evidence to support it. See Heath v. Sandersville R. Co., 23 Ga. App. 255 (98 S. E. 93).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. State
235 S.E.2d 675 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Union Traction Co. v. City of Muncie
133 N.E. 160 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 39, 25 Ga. App. 275, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-railroad-v-chastain-gactapp-1920.