Sutter v. Perales

New York Court of Appeals

Sutter v. Perales

64 N.Y.2d 1095

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 25, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 64 N.Y.2d 1095 (Sutter v. Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sutter v. Perales, 64 N.Y.2d 1095 (N.Y. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

64 N.Y.2d 1095 (1985)

Corinne Sutter, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant,
v.
Cesar Perales, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued March 25, 1985. Decided April 25, 1985.

Bryan D. Hetherington and Edwin J. Lopez-Soto for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Alan W. Rubenstein, Robert Hermann and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for Cesar Perales, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, respondent.

James A. Robinson and Milo I. Tomanovich for W. Burton Richardson, as Director of the Monroe County Department of Social Services, respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER.

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (103 AD2d 1029; see, Matter of Jones v Blum, 64 N.Y.2d 918).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

64 N.Y.2d 1095 (1985)

Corinne Sutter, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant,
v.
Cesar Perales, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued March 25, 1985. Decided April 25, 1985.

Bryan D. Hetherington and Edwin J. Lopez-Soto for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Alan W. Rubenstein, Robert Hermann and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for Cesar Perales, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, respondent.

James A. Robinson and Milo I. Tomanovich for W. Burton Richardson, as Director of the Monroe County Department of Social Services, respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER.

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (103 AD2d 1029; see, Matter of Jones v Blum, 64 N.Y.2d 918).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 N.Y.2d 1095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutter-v-perales-ny-1985.

Opinion

Corinne Sutter, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. Cesar Perales, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Corinne Sutter, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant,
v.
Cesar Perales, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.