Sutherland v. Commissioner of Social Security

377 F. App'x 287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sutherland v. Commissioner of Social Security. Read the opinion of the Court — 407 F. App'x 699
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 5, 2010·No. No. 09-1243·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Sutherland appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Commissioner and upholding the [288]*288denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sutherland v. Commissioner, No. 4:08-cv00006-jlk-bwc, 2009 WL 331263 (W.D.Va. Feb. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutherland v. Commissioner of Social Security, 377 F. App'x 287 (4th Cir. 2010).

377 F. App'x 287 (Sutherland v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.