Sutherland v. Commissioner of Social Security

407 F. App'x 699
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 18, 2011·No. No. 10-1793·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[700] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Virgil H. Sutherland appeals the district court’s order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, and affirming the decision of the Commissioner to deny Sutherland disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sutherland v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 1:08-cv-00541-MR (W.D.N.C. June 28, 2010). We grant Sutherland leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutherland v. Commissioner of Social Security, 407 F. App'x 699 (4th Cir. 2011).

407 F. App'x 699 (Sutherland v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moss v. Garland
W.D. Virginia, 2024
Sutherland v. Astrue
181 L. Ed. 2d 102 (Supreme Court, 2011)