Susan Anthony-Potter v. Scott Michael Potter

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 3, 2014·No. 01-14-00035-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00035-CV Style: Susan Anthony Potter v. Scott Michael Potter Date motions filed*: March 14, 2014, and June 11, 2014 Type of motions: Motion to Request an Extension of Time to File Brief and Motion for Extension of Briefing Deadline Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motions are:

 Granted in part and dismissed in part If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ A clerk’s record has not been filed with this Court, and the appellate record is not complete. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1. Because the appellate record is not yet complete, appellant’s brief is not due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s motion for an extension to file appellant’s brief, filed on March 14, 2014, and motion for extension of briefing deadline, filed on June 11, 2014, as moot.

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: July 3, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Susan Anthony-Potter v. Scott Michael Potter, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Susan Anthony-Potter v. Scott Michael Potter (Susan Anthony-Potter v. Scott Michael Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.