Susan Anthony-Potter v. Scott Michael Potter

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 28, 2014·No. 01-14-00035-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 28, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00035-CV ——————————— SUSAN ANTHONY-POTTER, Appellant V. SCOTT MICHAEL POTTER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 308th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-71147

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Susan Anthony-Potter, has neither established indigence nor paid,

or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal,

appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Susan Anthony-Potter v. Scott Michael Potter, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Susan Anthony-Potter v. Scott Michael Potter (Susan Anthony-Potter v. Scott Michael Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.