Susan Anthony-Potter v. Scott Michael Potter
Opinion
Opinion issued August 28, 2014.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00035-CV ——————————— SUSAN ANTHONY-POTTER, Appellant V. SCOTT MICHAEL POTTER, Appellee
On Appeal from the 308th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-71147
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Susan Anthony-Potter, has neither established indigence nor paid,
or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal,
appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending
motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Susan Anthony-Potter v. Scott Michael Potter (Susan Anthony-Potter v. Scott Michael Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.