Surrick v. Hoffman

458 A.2d 940, 500 Pa. 533, 1983 Pa. LEXIS 651
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 27, 1983
Docket24 E.D. Miscellaneous Docket 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 458 A.2d 940 (Surrick v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Surrick v. Hoffman, 458 A.2d 940, 500 Pa. 533, 1983 Pa. LEXIS 651 (Pa. 1983).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

No merit having been found in plaintiff’s objections to the unanimous order of the full Court dated January 26, 1983, the complaint in quo warranto is dismissed and judgment entered in favor of defendant.

NIX, J., files a dissenting opinion in which McDERMOTT, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Johns
812 A.2d 1260 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
Commonwealth v. Rice
465 A.2d 68 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Surrick v. Hoffman
458 A.2d 940 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 A.2d 940, 500 Pa. 533, 1983 Pa. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/surrick-v-hoffman-pa-1983.