Surrick v. Hoffman

458 A.2d 940, 500 Pa. 533, 1983 Pa. LEXIS 651
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 27, 1983·No. 24 E.D. Miscellaneous Docket 1983·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

No merit having been found in plaintiff’s objections to the unanimous order of the full Court dated January 26, 1983, the complaint in quo warranto is dismissed and judgment entered in favor of defendant.

NIX, J., files a dissenting opinion in which McDERMOTT, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Surrick v. Hoffman, 458 A.2d 940, 500 Pa. 533, 1983 Pa. LEXIS 651 (Pa. 1983).

458 A.2d 940 (Surrick v. Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Johns
812 A.2d 1260 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
Commonwealth v. Rice
465 A.2d 68 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Surrick v. Hoffman
458 A.2d 940 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)