Surey v. Liferestore MD USA LLC NC1 LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina·Decided April 23, 2025·No. 7:22-cv-00036·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case No. 7:22-cv-00036-M TAMARA SUREY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ORDER ) LIFERESTORE MD USA LLC NC1 LLC, ) LIFERESTORE MD USA LLC, ) DAVID AKINA, and ) ALLEN MEGLIN, ) ) Defendants. )

This matter comes before the court on the Joint Motion for Judicial Settlement Conference filed by Plaintiff Tamara Surey and Defendant Allen Meglin [DE 103]. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED as follows. At the parties’ request, a settlement conference shall be scheduled before and conducted by the Honorable Robert B. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge. To facilitate this conference, the jury trial currently scheduled on May 12, 2025, is CONTINUED and will commence at the court’s next available date on Monday, June 30, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1, Alton Lennon Federal Courthouse, 2 Princess Street, Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401. The following deadlines and requirements shall govern pretrial and trial activities: 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(e), the court will hold a final pretrial conference in Courtroom 1, Wilmington, on Monday, June 23, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. Each party appearing in this action must be represented at the conference by the attorney who is to have charge of the conduct of the trial on behalf of such party.

2. Not later than June 16, 2025, counsel must file the parties’ proposed pretrial order. See Local Civil Rule 16.1(b). This filing must comply with the form specified in Local Civil Rule 16.1(c). Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.1(c)(3), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3), objections not disclosed within the pretrial order are waived unless excused by the court for good cause. In addition, because the pretrial order supersedes prior pleadings and orders and controls all subsequent proceedings, Rockwell Intern. Corp. v. U.S., 549 U.S. 457, 474 (2007), any claims or defenses not set forth in the pretrial order will be deemed abandoned. The parties must submit copies of all exhibits referenced within the pretrial order at the beginning of the trial. See Local Civil Rule 39.1(b). Simultaneous to filing, counsel also shall submit an electronic copy of said proposed pretrial order to chambers, in Word format, at the following email address: documents judge _myers@nced.uscourts.gov. 3. When the question or issue bearing on admissibility of evidence cannot reasonably be contemplated in advance of the final pretrial conference, any motion in limine must be filed by June 23, 2025, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 39.1 (a). 4. Before trial, counsel shall familiarize themselves with the technology available in the courtroom. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.10(b), if a party has a need for any type of courtroom technology for a hearing or trial, including but not limited to any audio equipment, video equipment, document presentation system, and jury evidentiary recording system, counsel must notify the case manager at (910) 679-2022 and request training from the court’s information-technology staff for the person(s) who will be operating the courtroom technology. Unless excepted by the clerk, no later than seven (7) days before the scheduled proceeding in which such technology is used, counsel

must file a certification provided by the court’s technology staff that such training has been completed. Counsel shall review all related documentation appearing upon the court’s website, including information concerning the formatting of evidentiary media. 5. Not later than June 16, 2025, the parties shall file a proposed verdict form. Counsel also shall submit an electronic copy of the proposed verdict form to chambers, in Word format, at the following email address: documents _judge_myers@nced.uscourts.gov. 6. Not later than June 16, 2025, the parties shall file proposed jury instructions as follows. The parties shall confer and prepare a set of joint proposed jury instructions; for any instructions on which the parties do not agree, the party proposing the instruction shall submit it. All three sets of proposed instructions (joint, plaintiff's, and defendant’s) shall cite relevant legal authority. Counsel also shall submit electronic copies of the proposed jury instructions to chambers, in Word format, at the following email address: documents judge _myers@nced.uscourts.gov. 7. Not later than June 16, 2025, the parties shall submit any proposed voir dire questions for the court’s consideration in preparing to examine prospective jurors, in Word format, at the following email address: documents_judge_myers@nced.uscourts.gov. 8. Not later than June 16, 2025, the parties shall file trial briefs comprised of concise memoranda of authorities on all anticipated evidentiary objections and on all contested issues of law. See Local Rule 39.1. Unless otherwise permitted, these briefs shall be no longer than twenty pages. No responses will be permitted. 9. At the final pretrial conference, the court will: a. Rule on any dispute concerning the contents of the final pretrial order. See Local Civil Rule 16.1(d)(1).

b. Rule on any dispute regarding video depositions anticipated to be used and for which the parties have been unable to reach agreement concerning editing. See Local Civil Rule 16.1(b)(2). c. Preview proposed testimony and exhibits, and rule on contested issues of law, anticipated evidentiary objections, and motions in limine related to admissibility of evidence, to the extent possible at the time of the pretrial conference. See Local Civil Rule 39.1(a). d. Discuss generally the nature of the parties’ proposed jury instructions and verdict form, to discern areas of agreement and disagreement. e. Endeavor to streamline the trial to avoid wasting time on undisputed or immaterial matters by considering, where applicable: bifurcation; presentation of non-critical testimony by deposition excerpts; and stipulations regarding, inter alia, the content of testimony to be given and the qualifications of expert witnesses. The parties shall be prepared to address how to streamline the trial. f. Explore once more any opportunities for settlement. This trial scheduling order shall not be modified except by leave of court upon a showing of good cause, and all requirements set forth within the court’s Local Civil Rules governing pretrial and trial procedures not altered herein shall be strictly observed.

SO ORDERED this day of April, 2025. lal EV yrs RICHARD E. MYERS IT CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Surey v. Liferestore MD USA LLC NC1 LLC, (E.D.N.C. 2025).

Surey v. Liferestore MD USA LLC NC1 LLC (Surey v. Liferestore MD USA LLC NC1 LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rockwell International Corp. v. United States
549 U.S. 457 (Supreme Court, 2007)