Supply Pro, Inc. and Harmon K. Fine, Individually v. Ecosorb International, Inc., D/B/A Biocel Technologies

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 18, 2017
Docket01-15-00621-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Supply Pro, Inc. and Harmon K. Fine, Individually v. Ecosorb International, Inc., D/B/A Biocel Technologies (Supply Pro, Inc. and Harmon K. Fine, Individually v. Ecosorb International, Inc., D/B/A Biocel Technologies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Supply Pro, Inc. and Harmon K. Fine, Individually v. Ecosorb International, Inc., D/B/A Biocel Technologies, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENTS FILED IN CASE STAYED FOR BANKRUPTCY

Appellate case name: Supply Pro, Inc. and Harmon K. Fine, Individually v. Ecosorb International, Inc., d/b/a Biocel Technologies

Appellate case number: 01-15-00621-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-24524

Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County

This appeal is stayed pursuant to the Notice of Bankruptcy that appellant Harmon K. Fine filed in this Court on July 10, 2017, stating that a petition for relief was filed for him in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division on July 9, 2017 in in In re Harmon Kenneth Fine, Case No. 17-34240. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (2000) (automatic stay in bankruptcy). Until the parties notify the Court that the Bankruptcy has concluded and move to reinstate the case, the Court will take no further action other than to receive and hold any documents tendered during the period of suspension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2 (providing bankruptcy suspends “the appeal” from date bankruptcy petition was filed until court reinstates or severs appeal in accordance with federal law); see also Budzyn v. Citibank (S.D.), N.A., No. 01–08– 00211–CV, 2010 WL 2044628, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 19, 2010, no pet.) (staying “entire appeal”).

Unless a party successfully moves to reinstate the appeal or sever the appeal with respect to the bankrupt party, this appeal will be an inactive case on the Court’s docket. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd  Acting for the Court

Date: July 18, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Automatic stay
11 U.S.C. § 362(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Supply Pro, Inc. and Harmon K. Fine, Individually v. Ecosorb International, Inc., D/B/A Biocel Technologies, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/supply-pro-inc-and-harmon-k-fine-individually-v-ecosorb-international-texapp-2017.