Superior Cafeteria & Lunch Co. v. Britton
This text of 307 F.2d 663 (Superior Cafeteria & Lunch Co. v. Britton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a workmen’s compensation case, in which the employer and its insurance carrier seek to set aside an award made by the Deputy Commissioner. The employee, a man of 69, suffered an inguinal hernia when he lifted a case of canned goods during his employment. Surgery was originally recommended, but was not performed because the employee’s poor state of health was deemed by the surgeons to preclude it. He suffered from myocardial weakness, coronary insufficiency, interference with transmission of the heart beat, and urinary infection. Appellants urge that under Section 8(f) of the governing statute1 the employee-was suffering from a “previous disability,” and that appellants should accordingly be relieved from payment of compensation for permanent partial disability resulting from the hernia. We do not agree. We accept the Government’s position that the employee’s underlying weakness and poor health did not under the circumstances of this case constitute-previous disability within the meaning of the statute, or increase his disability from the work-produced hernia, but simply prevented possible reduction of the-hernia disability by surgery. We therefore regard Section 8(f) as inapplicable.2 The grant by the District Court of summary judgment to the Government will accordingly be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
307 F.2d 663, 1962 A.M.C. 2692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/superior-cafeteria-lunch-co-v-britton-cadc-1962.