Suntech of Conn., Inc. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Suntech of Conn., Inc. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.

169 A.3d 234, 326 Conn. 923, 2017 WL 4367964, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 254

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 13, 2017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 173 Conn.App. 321, 164 A.3d 36 (2017), is granted, limited to the following question:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff failed to prove that the trial court committed harmful error when it precluded the plaintiffs fact witness, Rick Cianfaglione, from testifying as to his observations and perceptions, not permitting the plaintiffs counsel to make an offer of proof, and disregarding Ciafaglione's deposition transcript?"

McDONALD and D'AURIA, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 173 Conn.App. 321, 164 A.3d 36 (2017), is granted, limited to the following question:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff failed to prove that the trial court committed harmful error when it precluded the plaintiffs fact witness, Rick Cianfaglione, from testifying as to his observations and perceptions, not permitting the plaintiffs counsel to make an offer of proof, and disregarding Ciafaglione's deposition transcript?"

McDONALD and D'AURIA, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Suntech of Conn., Inc. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc., 169 A.3d 234, 326 Conn. 923, 2017 WL 4367964, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 254 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

169 A.3d 234 (Suntech of Conn., Inc. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related