Suntech of Conn., Inc. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.

169 A.3d 234, 326 Conn. 923, 2017 WL 4367964, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 254
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 13, 2017
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 A.3d 234 (Suntech of Conn., Inc. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suntech of Conn., Inc. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc., 169 A.3d 234, 326 Conn. 923, 2017 WL 4367964, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 254 (Colo. 2017).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 173 Conn.App. 321, 164 A.3d 36 (2017), is granted, limited to the following question:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff failed to prove that the trial court committed harmful error when it precluded the plaintiffs fact witness, Rick Cianfaglione, from testifying as to his observations and perceptions, not permitting the plaintiffs counsel to make an offer of proof, and disregarding Ciafaglione's deposition transcript?"

McDONALD and D'AURIA, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Suntech of Conn., Inc. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.
193 A.3d 1208 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 A.3d 234, 326 Conn. 923, 2017 WL 4367964, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suntech-of-conn-inc-v-lawrence-brunoli-inc-conn-2017.