Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission

Supreme Court

Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission

353 U.S. 944, 1 L. Ed. 2d 794, 77 S. Ct. 792, 7 Oil & Gas Rep. 547, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 1005

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 29, 1957

DocketNo. 814

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 353 U.S. 944 (Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 353 U.S. 944, 1 L. Ed. 2d 794, 77 S. Ct. 792, 7 Oil & Gas Rep. 547, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 1005 (1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The power of the Court of Appeals in reviewing the order of the Federal Power Commission was exhausted when it held that the Commission had authority under § 7 (c) and (e) of the Natural Gas Act to issue certificates of public convenience and necessity of limited duration. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp., 318 U. S. 80. The judgment is therefore reversed and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for remand to the Commission with directions to consider the applications on their merits. The Commission, now agreeing with the Court of Appeals as to its authority, agrees to this disposition of the case.

Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The power of the Court of Appeals in reviewing the order of the Federal Power Commission was exhausted when it held that the Commission had authority under § 7 (c) and (e) of the Natural Gas Act to issue certificates of public convenience and necessity of limited duration. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp., 318 U. S. 80. The judgment is therefore reversed and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for remand to the Commission with directions to consider the applications on their merits. The Commission, now agreeing with the Court of Appeals as to its authority, agrees to this disposition of the case.

Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 U.S. 944, 1 L. Ed. 2d 794, 77 S. Ct. 792, 7 Oil & Gas Rep. 547, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sunray-mid-continent-oil-co-v-federal-power-commission-scotus-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack