Sundale Associates, Ltd. v. Moore

481 So. 2d 1300, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 289
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 1986
Docket85-2493
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 481 So. 2d 1300 (Sundale Associates, Ltd. v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sundale Associates, Ltd. v. Moore, 481 So. 2d 1300, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 289 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

481 So.2d 1300 (1986)

SUNDALE ASSOCIATES, LTD., the Sunrise Club, Inc., and Philip J. Scutieri, Jr., Individually, Petitioners,
v.
The Honorable Edward N. MOORE, Circuit Judge, Philip Revitz, Former Receiver and Southeast Bank, N.A., Respondents.

No. 85-2493.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 28, 1986.

*1301 Bailey & Dawes and Guy Bailey and Jesse C. Jones and Hal S. Vogel, Miami, for petitioners.

Steel, Hector & Davis and Vance E. Salter; Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin and Robert Josefsberg, Miami, for respondents.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Several years after the termination of a receivership established in the action involved in Sundale Associates, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 471 So.2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), the former receiver successfully moved the trial court to permit the award of attorney's fees and costs for the defense of ongoing actions brought by one of the parties against the receiver and his employees personally for allegedly tortious acts committed during the receivership. Because these expenses did not arise out of the receivership and could not in any way benefit the receivership estate, as opposed to the receiver individually, the trial court wholly lacked authority to award them. In re Fredcris, Inc., 108 So.2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959). Accordingly, we grant the instant petition for prohibition precluding the lower court from further proceedings in the matter. See Miraglia v. Geiger, 463 So.2d 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

Prohibition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saga Bay Gardens Condominium Ass'n v. For the Appointment of Blanket Receiver
127 So. 3d 800 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Fortune International Hospitality, LLC v. M Resort Residences Condominium Ass'n
77 So. 3d 741 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.
173 P.3d 1122 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2007)
Lee Management, Inc. v. Financial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
556 So. 2d 536 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Tanner v. Ledington
513 So. 2d 255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
481 So. 2d 1300, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sundale-associates-ltd-v-moore-fladistctapp-1986.